Eighteenth Century Theatre Personalities ~ John Philip Kemble 1757 - 1823

Kemble
John Philip Kemble as Hamlet 1801. 

John Philip Kemble

John Philip Kemble as Hamlet 1801.   Engraving George Adcock from a painting by Sir Thomas Lawrence (1769 - 1830), published by Fisher in 1844.  This image is in the public domain because the copyright has expired.

The original painting is in the collection of the Tate Gallery.  When on display in September 2004 the following caption was displayed:

John Philip Kemble as Hamlet 1801, Oil on canvas support: 3061 x 1981 mm, painting.  Presented by King William IV 1836. 'Kemble was the leading tragic actor on the English stage. This painting, exhibited at the Academy in 1801, is the most famous of four huge canvases which Lawrence painted showing Kemble in various dramatic roles.

It shows the importance of size as a means of dominating the Academy’s exhibitions. Portraits like this would be shown ‘above the line’, that is with their frames resting on a moulding eight foot (2.4 m) from the floor. This meant they could be seen above the heads of the crowds. . . .


Kemble's appointment as manager of the Drury Lane theatre, in 1788, gave him the opportunity to introduce changes in costume, informed by his own sense rather than theatrical tradition and to experiment with a variety of roles.  During this period he played many parts, including many Shakespearean characters and numerous minor plays, now forgotten.

In his own version of Coriolanus, which was revived during his first season, the character of the 'noble Roman' was so exactly suited to his powers that he not only played it with a perfection that has never been approached, but, it is said, unconsciously allowed its influence to colour his private manner and modes of speech. His tall and imposing person, noble countenance, and solemn and grave demeanour were uniquely adapted for the Roman characters in Shakespeare's plays; and, when in addition had to depict the gradual growth and development of one absorbing passion, his representation gathered a momentum and majestic force that were irresistible.

In 1785 the well-known actor, John Henderson, asked his friend, the critic Richard Sharp, to go and see the newcomer, Kemble, and to report back to him. Sharp described what he had found.

'I went, as I promised, to see the new ‘Hamlet’, whose provincial fame had excited your curiosity as well as mine. There has not been such a first appearance since yours: yet Nature, though she has been bountiful to him in figure and feature, has denied him a voice; of course he could not exemplify his own direction for the players to ‘speak the speech trippingly on the tongue’, and now and then he was as deliberate in his delivery as if he had been reading prayers, and had waited for the response. He is a very handsome man, almost tall and almost large, with features of a sensible but fixed and tragic cast; his action is graceful, though somewhat formal, which you will find it hard to believe, yet it is true. Very careful study appears in all he says and all he does; but there is more singularity and ingenuity, than simplicity and fire. Upon the whole he strikes me rather as a finished French performer, than as a varied and vigorous English actor, and it is plain he will succeed better in heroic, than in natural and passionate tragedy. Excepting in serious parts, I suppose he will never put on the sock. You have been so long without a ‘brother near the throne’ that it will perhaps be serviceable to you to be obliged to bestir yourself in Hamlet, Macbeth, Lord Townley and Maskwell; but in Lear, Richard, Falstaff and Benedict you have nothing to fear...'

Various writers commented on Kemble's style. Kemble was lacking in flexibility, variety, rapidity; the characteristic of his style was method, regularity, precision, elaboration even of the minutest details, founded on a thorough psychological study of the special personality he had to represent.

His elocutionary art, his fine sense of rhythm and emphasis, enabled him to excel in declamation, but physically he was incapable of giving expression to impetuous vehemence and searching pathos. In Coriolanus and Cato he was beyond praise, and possibly he may have been superior to both Garrick and Kean in Macbeth, although it must be remembered that in this role part of his inspiration must have been caught from Mrs Siddons.

In all the other great Shakespearean characters he was, according to the best critics, inferior to them, least so in Lear (though he never played Shakespeare's tragic Lear, preferring the happy ending History of King Lear as adapted by Nahum Tate.

[(This page incorporates text from the Encyclopædia Britannica, Eleventh Edition, a publication now in the public domain.]

Top              

Cato
John Phillip Kemble in the role of Cato in Addison's Cato, at Covent Garden in 1816.

Kemble at Covent Garden

John Phillip Kemble in the role of Cato in Addison's Cato, at Covent Garden in 1816.  Engraved by Kirkwood after a drawing by George Cruikshank engraved 1822 and published as an illustration in the 1822 printing of Joseph Addison's play 'Cato', published by  T. Hughes, London.  This image is in the public domain because the copyright has expired.

As the older son in an acting family, he spent his childhood on stage, making his first adult appearance on the stage in 1776. After several years in the provinces, he played Hamlet in Dublin in November 1781 and made his London debut in the same role in Drury Lane in September 1783 with mixed results. It was, however, his performance in Macbeth in March 1785, opposite his sister, Sarah, that established him as a popular favourite.

Gradually, Kemble had gained a high reputation as a careful and finished actor, and this, combined with the greater fame of his sister, Sarah, led to an engagement at the Theatre Royal, Drury Lane  Here, he made his first appearance in 1783 as Hamlet. His performance was well received by the critics but public approval was muted. However, his status as a leading player was confirmed when he appeared as Macbeth in 1785. His first appearances at Drury Lane with his sister Sarah was in 1783, when they played the roles of Mr Beverley and Mrs Beverley in Edward Moore's , "The Gamester" and as King John and Constance in Shakespeare's tragedy. In the following year they played Montgomerie and Matilda in Richard Cumberland's The Carmelite, and in 1785 Adorni and Camiola in Kemble's adaptation of Philip Massinger's A Maid of Honour, and Othello and Desdemona.

As actor and manager of the Drury Lane Theatre and Covent Garden his reforms improved the status of the theatrical profession.  He played heavy dramatic roles in the artificial and statuesque style then in vogue. His most famous roles were Brutus in Julius Caesar and the title roles in Hamlet and, above all, Coriolanus. He excelled in declamation but could not express strong or subtle emotions.

Kemble was appointed manager of Drury Lane Theatre in 1788.  He made important reforms in costumes, scenery and management, introducing live animals and aquatic effects to the stage for the first time. As an actor, Kemble's tall and imposing figure, impressive countenance and grave and solemn demeanour made him uniquely suited for the Roman characters in Shakespeare's plays.

Kemble's appointment as manager of the Drury Lane theatre, in 1788, gave him the opportunity to introduce changes in costume, informed by his own sense rather than theatrical tradition and to experiment with a variety of roles.  During this period he played many parts, including many Shakespearean characters and numerous minor plays, now forgotten.

After difficulties with Sheridan, the proprietor of Drury Lane, Kemble withdrew from the management and, at the close of 1802, resigned his connection with the Theatre.

In 1803 he acquired a sixth share of the Theatre Royal, Covent Garden and became company manager. The theatre was destroyed by fire in September 1808.  The rebuilt theatre opened in 1809 but the increased prices led to the 'Old Price Riots' and performances were suspended for three months. Kemble was almost ruined by the fire, and was only saved by a generous loan, afterwards converted into a gift, of £10,000 from the Duke of Northumberland.

He retired to the continent after his last performance as Coriolanus on June 23rd 1817.

[This article incorporates text from the Encyclopædia Britannica, Eleventh Edition, a publication now in the public domain.]

Top         

 

 


Top

Updated December 4, 2011